Wednesday
Sep302020
A Case of Her
Oh, I am a lonely painter
I live in a box of paints
I'm frightened by the devil
And I'm drawn to those ones that ain't afraid
I remember that time you told me, you said
"Love is touching souls"
Surely you touched mine, 'cause
Part of you pours out of me
In these lines from time to time
-A Case of You/Joni Mitchell
I grieve over so many missed opportunities of companionship with women free of labels throughout my life as a result of a childhood steeped in religious patriarchy. Mormonism is constructed around the reverential worship of man. He is said to have been bestowed with special spiritual power. The 'priesthood' is the eternal power and authority of god. A blank check, essentially, for men to do whatever they want in the name of god. One can easily imagine the heady authoritarianism that ensues in homes and churches.
When you hold the power you must do what it takes to keep the power, as we're all seeing play out in American politics. When you've convinced millions that god is literally whispering righteous, ubiquitous truths in your ear, you're going to wield his 'revelations' in the service of continued dominance. Thus, Mormon man is the indisputable head of his family, empowered by the almighty himself. What about women? Well, they can teach each other and children, although that requires supervision and guidance by male priesthood-holding leaders.
Latter-day Saints, as they prefer to be called these days, also revile homosexual behavior. Setting aside the pervasive dominance of men in nearly every aspect of society for a moment, it is nothing short of infuriating that heterosexual is the default assumption from birth and people must "come out" as queer. If the default is hetero we all need to work that much harder to climb up and away from that presumption. Most people, especially men, don't or can't do the work because presumption hardens to unquestioned fact at a very early age, especially in a culture that celebrates toxic, hetero behavior as strength and equates gay with weakness. What do we call men judged as weak? Say it with me everyone: PUSSIES. Or bitches. Or girls.
Only now discovering the range of my sexuality at 43, I am testament to the long arm of the patriarchal, heteronormative law. Why can't we begin at a base level of no sexuality and let people explore their sexual character until they die? Sexuality is infinite shades of gray and as fluid as water even though mainstream society apparently needs it carved in stone, commandment-style: on a scale of hetero to homo I'm such-and-such number for time and all eternity! The more hetero the number the bigger the societal embrace. Incidentally, I include asexuality on the spectrum. Often I feel my most sexual alone with my body. A raw, pure, non-performative sexuality that desires no one, belongs only to me.
*****
I used to wonder who I'd be if I'd had a sister. A softer, kinder, less defensive woman maybe? But I did have sisters. There was plucky Ramona Quimby, the inquisitive Harriet Welsch of spy fame, Laura Ingalls, Ann Shirley and her more stoic counterpart, Emily Byrd Starr, L.M. Montogermy's lesser known literary daughter. There was Margaret Simon of Are You There God notoriety, Claudia Kishi - my favorite babysitter - the annoyingly perfect Jessica and Elizabeth Wakefield, Pollyanna, Scout Finch, Anne Frank, Jo March and many more.
These literary sisters, all available whenever I wanted an unconditional friend. Female perspectives and lives open to me whenever I needed to disappear, which was not infrequent. Safe places and spaces offering feminine companionship all because women created them. Women conceiving women for the edification of all women. Wise, creative souls planting roots deep underground where they can't be spotted and yanked from the soft soil by the rough, violent hands of men. Like centuries-old trees quietly growing and whispering wisdoms on the breeze, we're all spreading our roots in search of one another. Clawing and stretching through ancient dirt and bones, reaching across the miles and years to entwine limbs and hold each other. We are here. Always have been. Dig deeper, sweet girl. We are waiting.
Find your sisters, literary or otherwise and don't ever let them go.
"I am a composite of all the women I have loved. I am built and reconstituted from my memories of them: words and embraces exchanged, the smell of their hair and the soap smoothed into their skin. This sounds romantic, I know, and it is: my most intimate female relationships have always, at least in my perception, been romances of their own, untethered from my erotic life - until they weren't." - Rachel Vorona Cote, Too Much
A biological sister wasn't in the cards for me. Now, I think my desperate desire for feminine companionship in my childhood was less about a sister and more about a general, consuming need for women of which I was unaware. In much the way I wonder who I would be if a sister existed, I speculate about the life I would have led, the woman I'd be, if my sexuality hadn't been jammed through the heteronormative social machine, as happens to most, if not all, of us. It's not that I question my currently arrived at state of bisexuality (pansexuality, to be more precise) just that I believe that instead of a tendency toward being attracted to men, as I have been thus far, my default attraction to men may actually be a result of my Mormon upbringing in conjunction with the heteronormative machine. I may actually, naturally, tilt in the opposite direction: toward women.
So this is what it feels like--
to be free.
Forever free
from playing the mortar
to my crooked husband's
crooked little pestle.
Enough.
For my mother.
For my daughter.
And for all the daughters
I might have had.
The cycle ends here. - Mutta
Women thrill me. They are mysterious, complicated, strong, a well of intriguing, fiery emotion very often strategically concealed from the general populous. Frequently, the men I am closest to in my life frustrate and exhaust me. My father, brothers, exes, friends' husbands, colleagues: in every relationship there is a kind of disconnect much like when the audio doesn't quite match the video on TV. The programming can be incredible, but it's always slightly out of sync, leading to a generally frustrating experience. There is a lack of understanding or validation at least and automatic gaslighting at most, no matter how I contort my personality to accomodate a connection. I am always the aware and accommodating one, massaging conversations, making sure the status quo is maintained and inclines, however subtly, in the direction of their approval and pleasure. In the case of my marriage, always monitoring and manipulating, if needed, ordinary life circumstances to guard against his expected agitation or anger. Covering the grenade with my body to mitigate shrapnel. It felt inherent to wifehood, my responsibility. It was exhausting. And remains exhausting in divorce.
I have certainly loved specific men in my life but I've never experienced a love that ached deeply and quietly in my bones until I met Cory. He is a kind, soft-spoken, gentle soul who shies away from confrontation and argument, the very opposite of me or the woman I present to the world, anyway. I am realizing my boisterous, defensive exterior is an unconsciously crafted armor that belies an insecure, distrustul interior. Mostly, the only people to see through my facade have been women. And Cory. Interestingly, if one were throwing around gender stereotypes and labels, Cory falls in a self-effacing category typically judged feminine.
In our four years together, I don't recall Cory ever raising his voice to me. Ever. A stark contrast to a nearly decade-long marriage fraught with shouting and acute meanness then six years of divorce wherein my alleged negative qualities from the married years have been weaponized and wielded at every turn no matter how hard I have worked to change and prove my goodness, my worthiness as a mother, as a human. A well-worn page from the toxic male playbook, that. Listen to her confess her darkest secrets and fears, maybe even validate her, then pocket those disclosures for later when you'll callously use them against her without even a cursory comprehension of the extensive damage being inflicted, the trust being obliterated, the open heart contracting. Or worse, maybe the destruction they inflict is calculated. Deliberate debilitation.
What I'm endeavoring to say is I very well could've ended up lesbian or, at the very least, explored it much sooner than my forties, an age when society prefers I start keeping my sexuality to myself. And not just because I am attracted to both genders but because, with the exception of Cory, men in general do not feel safe to me and, I now realize, they never have. I do not trust them not to gaslight me or otherwise damage me and fuck with my head whether unwittingly or otherwise. Yes, I know 'not all men' and yes I realize many, many good ones are out there but I'm 43 years-old and can count on the fingers of one hand the men I know that I would fully trust with my heart in a romantic or platonic relationship.
*****
My first crush was probably Milla Jovovitch, who appeared on the cover of Seventeen magazine when she was just a couple years older than me. I didn't just want to be her, I wanted to be with her. Snuggling under covers, whispering hot, breathy secrets into each others ears. My naive Mormon mind incapable of imagining a kiss because that would be a sin, but oh, it wanted to. It really, really wanted to fantasize about kissing the beautiful Milla.
I once showed my best friend the cover of Seventeen magazine and attempted to casually ask if she ever thought about the girls on the pages or maybe even wondered what it would be like to kiss one of them. Her expression, tantamount to smelling spoiled milk, was such that I was certain my secret attraction to magazine girls was an unfortunate aberration and kept it to myself. I hadn't allowed any flutterings for girls outside the pages of Seventeen to occur and it stayed that way throughout high school.
In college, when I received my first computer courtesy of an older, initially-married boyfriend, I discovered lesbian porn. I had yet to masturbate but my fuzzy notion of sex between women tightened my chest and launched flares into other parts of my body. My inaugural case of being shamed for my internet history involved that boyfriend discovering my predilection for lesbian porn and declaring me disgusting for watching it. He was 42, I was 19. The resulting sexual humiliation was familiar and all-encompassing so I tossed the back massager I had just discovered could make me come in about 7 seconds into the dumpster near my condo. He later confiscated the first vibrator I ultimately ventured to a sex shop to purchase to replace the back massager. I kept it stashed in my underwear drawer until he swiped it and replaced it with one of the rich guy shoehorns he used to crowbar bougie tasseled loafers onto his feet. The shiny, metal shoehorn somewhat resembled the vibrator so I think it was meant to be a joke? It was an abysmal violation.
I maintain a cursory friendship with this man. He would probably still do anything for me were I to ask it and yet, as I type this, I feel delayed rage at his actions. At the time it seemed standard, appropriate even, for a man to sneak into my apartment and steal my vibrator, to be shamed for watching lesbian porn. I understand now he felt threatened by my ability to make myself come without him, by my interest in women, something he could never be no matter the size of his bank account. So he shamed me, made me feel defective, wrong. Tale as old as time.
This post wasn't even meant to be about him. The memory tumbled out as I attempted to recall my first awareness of lesbian sex. What did this experience do to me? Hard to say. Sexual shame is my milieu. Weaved throughout my life in microscopic and massive ways. A birthright. My mother's bequest and her mother's before her. A lineal birthright instigated and spurred by men and the women who blindly or shamefully or fearfully obey.
*****
I am bisexual. Pansexual, really. The physical parts don't matter so much as the person. The parts secondary to the personality. But pansexual is a relatively new term. It was bisexuality I struggled to reckon with in my life. Bisexuality and the myths that surround it confused the issue for me. Perhaps if I was only attracted to women I might have understood my sexuality more clearly. As it was, I felt like the homo part of me was a mistake, the outlier feeling in a consciousness immersed in the glory of the rightness and perfection of Adam and Eve, the original hetero humans. I don't even remember the term bisexual being used in my teens, although it likely was. The whole thing was terribly confusing.
At times, I briefly considered that I was actually gay and this burgeoning awareness of women was the transitional period as my brain dipped a toe in what I perceived as the terrifying waters of gayness. It felt like I was drowning in sin. I later contemplated the notion that my intense chest aches for the companionship of women were a result of being the only girl among three fiercely male brothers. Other times, I speculated that my confused feelings for girls were part of a natural coming-of-age phase. Female rite-of-passage curiosity. Regardless, I pushed it all down and tried not to think too much about it. Until now. I am finally able to view same-sex attraction without the insidious filter of OTHER that permeates so much of humanity's perception of gay. I just see humans and love.
During my early twenties I had two drunken encounters with women that didn't amount to much other than I noted I was highly attracted to both but had no idea what to do when they seemed willing to explore that with me. Lesbian sex was ill-defined, murky and based mostly on those snatches of lesbian porn I'd watched that were clearly created for men, not religiously ruined young women terrified of exploring their gayness. The repugnant word rugmuncher, often used by my brothers in my youth, haunted me, debilitated me with shame.
At 27 I married a strictly hetero man who conflated monogomy with romance and loyalty. This left no room for exploration of my sexuality outside of what I was already intensely familiar with: heterosexual, monogamous, dysfunctional marriage. In fact, my sexuality while married came to a full stop. There was no understanding or openness, no safe space to share my innermost needs or desires and the few times I did I was roundly ignored.
Early in my marriage, after confessing a lack of sexual desire to a Mormon friend, she earnestly explained to me that "you've just got to have sex with your husband, even when you don't feel like it. He needs it." It's our job as wives, she said. Take one for the team, I guess. Fulfilling his needs is our obligation. I'll never forget it.
My lack of desire for sex was strictly my fault, an accusation, a denunciatory finger pointed squarely at me. My reflexive retreat into myself in the face of sex as requirement was perceived as deliberate, something I was doing to him. And so sex quickly became about obligation; specifically, mine. The quantity of sex within my marriage felt intrinsically tied to my husband's evaluation of his own masculinity and self-worth which is a lot to bear when you're still working out what gets you off, thus the quality suffered. Ultimately I gave up trying to understand my sexuality in the infrequent service of his. I blame both of us.
After we divorced, he went on national television to charmingly discuss his failure to listen to me and other problems in our sex life, issues he never addressed directly with me during our marriage or afterward. A performative, male Mea culpa that in no way validated or acknowledged the very real anguish I experienced during our marriage. A decade of personal pain reduced to two minutes of pleasant morning show banter. That spurious progressive performance a speck in the rearview mirror, I suspect he would now place blame for any failure in our marriage squarely at my feet, as is his habit.
My relationship with Cory has been nothing short of a revelation. I have worked hard to be able to say that. Cory knows all my shit: my triggers, my weaknesses. Divorce and the unavoidable estrangement from someone you tried so hard to cultivate forever with will cause you to reevaluate everything you thought you knew about love and not in a bad way. In a realistic way, free from the bonds of social construct.
For many reasons beyond the three children who currently rule my existence and my skepticism about men and relationships, it took two years for me to even refer to Cory as my boyfriend. I had to make sure it was right. That we were on the same page. That he wouldn't turn on me, use my secrets against me, stifle my uncharted sexuality or kindle sexual obligation wherein my body does not feel like my own but a tool for male placation.
At the outset we discussed an open relationship stemming largely from my unexplored interest in women but also based in a mutual firm belief in the flaws inherent in monogamy: specifically that it tends to strangle and stagnate personalities and causes people to enact ownership over each other. We prefer a more open way of being, a willingness to choose to be with a person each day and year that passes as opposed to declaring 'until death do us part' out of the gate when we all know people change dramatically and unexpectedly over a lifetime and nothing is certain but the death part. Monogamous marriage or promising a lifetime love at the dawn of a partnering may feel romantic to some, but to me feels like willful ignorance at best and a hopeful lie at worst. I enjoy not knowing who and what is around the corner. I feel empowered knowing I don't require a significant other for my well-being, happiness or wholeness but that I am open to the mystery and excitement of whoever and whatever comes along. I want to forge new paths created from mutual respect and trust within every new relationship. Not blindly adhere to outdated relationship constructs handed down from a patriarchy that has enacted ownership of women for centuries.
Then she entered my world and cracked me wide open. She is an astoundingly brilliant, achingly beautiful, incredibly sexy woman that I have long admired. She has exploded my perspective in exquisitely gratifying ways. I didn't know what I was desperately missing until she showed up. My mind is an aperture widening to take in the panorama of possibility. THIS was here all along. Women are sharing this with each other and I wasn't in a place to fathom it. Until her. There is an unfamiliar seesaw of capability within our dynamic. Equity. She sees me, I see her: an unflinching, all-encompassing knowing. Like coming home but to a feeling instead of a place.
'I see you' the delicate necklace she sent me displays as it constantly brushes against my collar bones. Unconditional validation. Recognition and safety mingled with desire, passion lust and want but never need. A woman, a mother specifically but not necessarily, understands the heavy burden of need. Need is not romantic, it is obligation. She instinctively understands this.
We are free falling but there is no ground. Riding the wave until it crests and returns to the ocean. It is the mutual acknowledgement of the possibly ephemeral nature of the thing, the lack of forever proclamations, that make it so desirable and liberating.
Go figure. It is from the softness of women that everything is born.
I live in a box of paints
I'm frightened by the devil
And I'm drawn to those ones that ain't afraid
I remember that time you told me, you said
"Love is touching souls"
Surely you touched mine, 'cause
Part of you pours out of me
In these lines from time to time
-A Case of You/Joni Mitchell
I grieve over so many missed opportunities of companionship with women free of labels throughout my life as a result of a childhood steeped in religious patriarchy. Mormonism is constructed around the reverential worship of man. He is said to have been bestowed with special spiritual power. The 'priesthood' is the eternal power and authority of god. A blank check, essentially, for men to do whatever they want in the name of god. One can easily imagine the heady authoritarianism that ensues in homes and churches.
When you hold the power you must do what it takes to keep the power, as we're all seeing play out in American politics. When you've convinced millions that god is literally whispering righteous, ubiquitous truths in your ear, you're going to wield his 'revelations' in the service of continued dominance. Thus, Mormon man is the indisputable head of his family, empowered by the almighty himself. What about women? Well, they can teach each other and children, although that requires supervision and guidance by male priesthood-holding leaders.
Latter-day Saints, as they prefer to be called these days, also revile homosexual behavior. Setting aside the pervasive dominance of men in nearly every aspect of society for a moment, it is nothing short of infuriating that heterosexual is the default assumption from birth and people must "come out" as queer. If the default is hetero we all need to work that much harder to climb up and away from that presumption. Most people, especially men, don't or can't do the work because presumption hardens to unquestioned fact at a very early age, especially in a culture that celebrates toxic, hetero behavior as strength and equates gay with weakness. What do we call men judged as weak? Say it with me everyone: PUSSIES. Or bitches. Or girls.
Only now discovering the range of my sexuality at 43, I am testament to the long arm of the patriarchal, heteronormative law. Why can't we begin at a base level of no sexuality and let people explore their sexual character until they die? Sexuality is infinite shades of gray and as fluid as water even though mainstream society apparently needs it carved in stone, commandment-style: on a scale of hetero to homo I'm such-and-such number for time and all eternity! The more hetero the number the bigger the societal embrace. Incidentally, I include asexuality on the spectrum. Often I feel my most sexual alone with my body. A raw, pure, non-performative sexuality that desires no one, belongs only to me.
*****
I used to wonder who I'd be if I'd had a sister. A softer, kinder, less defensive woman maybe? But I did have sisters. There was plucky Ramona Quimby, the inquisitive Harriet Welsch of spy fame, Laura Ingalls, Ann Shirley and her more stoic counterpart, Emily Byrd Starr, L.M. Montogermy's lesser known literary daughter. There was Margaret Simon of Are You There God notoriety, Claudia Kishi - my favorite babysitter - the annoyingly perfect Jessica and Elizabeth Wakefield, Pollyanna, Scout Finch, Anne Frank, Jo March and many more.
These literary sisters, all available whenever I wanted an unconditional friend. Female perspectives and lives open to me whenever I needed to disappear, which was not infrequent. Safe places and spaces offering feminine companionship all because women created them. Women conceiving women for the edification of all women. Wise, creative souls planting roots deep underground where they can't be spotted and yanked from the soft soil by the rough, violent hands of men. Like centuries-old trees quietly growing and whispering wisdoms on the breeze, we're all spreading our roots in search of one another. Clawing and stretching through ancient dirt and bones, reaching across the miles and years to entwine limbs and hold each other. We are here. Always have been. Dig deeper, sweet girl. We are waiting.
Find your sisters, literary or otherwise and don't ever let them go.
"I am a composite of all the women I have loved. I am built and reconstituted from my memories of them: words and embraces exchanged, the smell of their hair and the soap smoothed into their skin. This sounds romantic, I know, and it is: my most intimate female relationships have always, at least in my perception, been romances of their own, untethered from my erotic life - until they weren't." - Rachel Vorona Cote, Too Much
A biological sister wasn't in the cards for me. Now, I think my desperate desire for feminine companionship in my childhood was less about a sister and more about a general, consuming need for women of which I was unaware. In much the way I wonder who I would be if a sister existed, I speculate about the life I would have led, the woman I'd be, if my sexuality hadn't been jammed through the heteronormative social machine, as happens to most, if not all, of us. It's not that I question my currently arrived at state of bisexuality (pansexuality, to be more precise) just that I believe that instead of a tendency toward being attracted to men, as I have been thus far, my default attraction to men may actually be a result of my Mormon upbringing in conjunction with the heteronormative machine. I may actually, naturally, tilt in the opposite direction: toward women.
So this is what it feels like--
to be free.
Forever free
from playing the mortar
to my crooked husband's
crooked little pestle.
Enough.
For my mother.
For my daughter.
And for all the daughters
I might have had.
The cycle ends here. - Mutta
Women thrill me. They are mysterious, complicated, strong, a well of intriguing, fiery emotion very often strategically concealed from the general populous. Frequently, the men I am closest to in my life frustrate and exhaust me. My father, brothers, exes, friends' husbands, colleagues: in every relationship there is a kind of disconnect much like when the audio doesn't quite match the video on TV. The programming can be incredible, but it's always slightly out of sync, leading to a generally frustrating experience. There is a lack of understanding or validation at least and automatic gaslighting at most, no matter how I contort my personality to accomodate a connection. I am always the aware and accommodating one, massaging conversations, making sure the status quo is maintained and inclines, however subtly, in the direction of their approval and pleasure. In the case of my marriage, always monitoring and manipulating, if needed, ordinary life circumstances to guard against his expected agitation or anger. Covering the grenade with my body to mitigate shrapnel. It felt inherent to wifehood, my responsibility. It was exhausting. And remains exhausting in divorce.
I have certainly loved specific men in my life but I've never experienced a love that ached deeply and quietly in my bones until I met Cory. He is a kind, soft-spoken, gentle soul who shies away from confrontation and argument, the very opposite of me or the woman I present to the world, anyway. I am realizing my boisterous, defensive exterior is an unconsciously crafted armor that belies an insecure, distrustul interior. Mostly, the only people to see through my facade have been women. And Cory. Interestingly, if one were throwing around gender stereotypes and labels, Cory falls in a self-effacing category typically judged feminine.
In our four years together, I don't recall Cory ever raising his voice to me. Ever. A stark contrast to a nearly decade-long marriage fraught with shouting and acute meanness then six years of divorce wherein my alleged negative qualities from the married years have been weaponized and wielded at every turn no matter how hard I have worked to change and prove my goodness, my worthiness as a mother, as a human. A well-worn page from the toxic male playbook, that. Listen to her confess her darkest secrets and fears, maybe even validate her, then pocket those disclosures for later when you'll callously use them against her without even a cursory comprehension of the extensive damage being inflicted, the trust being obliterated, the open heart contracting. Or worse, maybe the destruction they inflict is calculated. Deliberate debilitation.
What I'm endeavoring to say is I very well could've ended up lesbian or, at the very least, explored it much sooner than my forties, an age when society prefers I start keeping my sexuality to myself. And not just because I am attracted to both genders but because, with the exception of Cory, men in general do not feel safe to me and, I now realize, they never have. I do not trust them not to gaslight me or otherwise damage me and fuck with my head whether unwittingly or otherwise. Yes, I know 'not all men' and yes I realize many, many good ones are out there but I'm 43 years-old and can count on the fingers of one hand the men I know that I would fully trust with my heart in a romantic or platonic relationship.
*****
My first crush was probably Milla Jovovitch, who appeared on the cover of Seventeen magazine when she was just a couple years older than me. I didn't just want to be her, I wanted to be with her. Snuggling under covers, whispering hot, breathy secrets into each others ears. My naive Mormon mind incapable of imagining a kiss because that would be a sin, but oh, it wanted to. It really, really wanted to fantasize about kissing the beautiful Milla.
I once showed my best friend the cover of Seventeen magazine and attempted to casually ask if she ever thought about the girls on the pages or maybe even wondered what it would be like to kiss one of them. Her expression, tantamount to smelling spoiled milk, was such that I was certain my secret attraction to magazine girls was an unfortunate aberration and kept it to myself. I hadn't allowed any flutterings for girls outside the pages of Seventeen to occur and it stayed that way throughout high school.
In college, when I received my first computer courtesy of an older, initially-married boyfriend, I discovered lesbian porn. I had yet to masturbate but my fuzzy notion of sex between women tightened my chest and launched flares into other parts of my body. My inaugural case of being shamed for my internet history involved that boyfriend discovering my predilection for lesbian porn and declaring me disgusting for watching it. He was 42, I was 19. The resulting sexual humiliation was familiar and all-encompassing so I tossed the back massager I had just discovered could make me come in about 7 seconds into the dumpster near my condo. He later confiscated the first vibrator I ultimately ventured to a sex shop to purchase to replace the back massager. I kept it stashed in my underwear drawer until he swiped it and replaced it with one of the rich guy shoehorns he used to crowbar bougie tasseled loafers onto his feet. The shiny, metal shoehorn somewhat resembled the vibrator so I think it was meant to be a joke? It was an abysmal violation.
I maintain a cursory friendship with this man. He would probably still do anything for me were I to ask it and yet, as I type this, I feel delayed rage at his actions. At the time it seemed standard, appropriate even, for a man to sneak into my apartment and steal my vibrator, to be shamed for watching lesbian porn. I understand now he felt threatened by my ability to make myself come without him, by my interest in women, something he could never be no matter the size of his bank account. So he shamed me, made me feel defective, wrong. Tale as old as time.
This post wasn't even meant to be about him. The memory tumbled out as I attempted to recall my first awareness of lesbian sex. What did this experience do to me? Hard to say. Sexual shame is my milieu. Weaved throughout my life in microscopic and massive ways. A birthright. My mother's bequest and her mother's before her. A lineal birthright instigated and spurred by men and the women who blindly or shamefully or fearfully obey.
*****
I am bisexual. Pansexual, really. The physical parts don't matter so much as the person. The parts secondary to the personality. But pansexual is a relatively new term. It was bisexuality I struggled to reckon with in my life. Bisexuality and the myths that surround it confused the issue for me. Perhaps if I was only attracted to women I might have understood my sexuality more clearly. As it was, I felt like the homo part of me was a mistake, the outlier feeling in a consciousness immersed in the glory of the rightness and perfection of Adam and Eve, the original hetero humans. I don't even remember the term bisexual being used in my teens, although it likely was. The whole thing was terribly confusing.
At times, I briefly considered that I was actually gay and this burgeoning awareness of women was the transitional period as my brain dipped a toe in what I perceived as the terrifying waters of gayness. It felt like I was drowning in sin. I later contemplated the notion that my intense chest aches for the companionship of women were a result of being the only girl among three fiercely male brothers. Other times, I speculated that my confused feelings for girls were part of a natural coming-of-age phase. Female rite-of-passage curiosity. Regardless, I pushed it all down and tried not to think too much about it. Until now. I am finally able to view same-sex attraction without the insidious filter of OTHER that permeates so much of humanity's perception of gay. I just see humans and love.
During my early twenties I had two drunken encounters with women that didn't amount to much other than I noted I was highly attracted to both but had no idea what to do when they seemed willing to explore that with me. Lesbian sex was ill-defined, murky and based mostly on those snatches of lesbian porn I'd watched that were clearly created for men, not religiously ruined young women terrified of exploring their gayness. The repugnant word rugmuncher, often used by my brothers in my youth, haunted me, debilitated me with shame.
At 27 I married a strictly hetero man who conflated monogomy with romance and loyalty. This left no room for exploration of my sexuality outside of what I was already intensely familiar with: heterosexual, monogamous, dysfunctional marriage. In fact, my sexuality while married came to a full stop. There was no understanding or openness, no safe space to share my innermost needs or desires and the few times I did I was roundly ignored.
Early in my marriage, after confessing a lack of sexual desire to a Mormon friend, she earnestly explained to me that "you've just got to have sex with your husband, even when you don't feel like it. He needs it." It's our job as wives, she said. Take one for the team, I guess. Fulfilling his needs is our obligation. I'll never forget it.
My lack of desire for sex was strictly my fault, an accusation, a denunciatory finger pointed squarely at me. My reflexive retreat into myself in the face of sex as requirement was perceived as deliberate, something I was doing to him. And so sex quickly became about obligation; specifically, mine. The quantity of sex within my marriage felt intrinsically tied to my husband's evaluation of his own masculinity and self-worth which is a lot to bear when you're still working out what gets you off, thus the quality suffered. Ultimately I gave up trying to understand my sexuality in the infrequent service of his. I blame both of us.
After we divorced, he went on national television to charmingly discuss his failure to listen to me and other problems in our sex life, issues he never addressed directly with me during our marriage or afterward. A performative, male Mea culpa that in no way validated or acknowledged the very real anguish I experienced during our marriage. A decade of personal pain reduced to two minutes of pleasant morning show banter. That spurious progressive performance a speck in the rearview mirror, I suspect he would now place blame for any failure in our marriage squarely at my feet, as is his habit.
My relationship with Cory has been nothing short of a revelation. I have worked hard to be able to say that. Cory knows all my shit: my triggers, my weaknesses. Divorce and the unavoidable estrangement from someone you tried so hard to cultivate forever with will cause you to reevaluate everything you thought you knew about love and not in a bad way. In a realistic way, free from the bonds of social construct.
For many reasons beyond the three children who currently rule my existence and my skepticism about men and relationships, it took two years for me to even refer to Cory as my boyfriend. I had to make sure it was right. That we were on the same page. That he wouldn't turn on me, use my secrets against me, stifle my uncharted sexuality or kindle sexual obligation wherein my body does not feel like my own but a tool for male placation.
At the outset we discussed an open relationship stemming largely from my unexplored interest in women but also based in a mutual firm belief in the flaws inherent in monogamy: specifically that it tends to strangle and stagnate personalities and causes people to enact ownership over each other. We prefer a more open way of being, a willingness to choose to be with a person each day and year that passes as opposed to declaring 'until death do us part' out of the gate when we all know people change dramatically and unexpectedly over a lifetime and nothing is certain but the death part. Monogamous marriage or promising a lifetime love at the dawn of a partnering may feel romantic to some, but to me feels like willful ignorance at best and a hopeful lie at worst. I enjoy not knowing who and what is around the corner. I feel empowered knowing I don't require a significant other for my well-being, happiness or wholeness but that I am open to the mystery and excitement of whoever and whatever comes along. I want to forge new paths created from mutual respect and trust within every new relationship. Not blindly adhere to outdated relationship constructs handed down from a patriarchy that has enacted ownership of women for centuries.
Then she entered my world and cracked me wide open. She is an astoundingly brilliant, achingly beautiful, incredibly sexy woman that I have long admired. She has exploded my perspective in exquisitely gratifying ways. I didn't know what I was desperately missing until she showed up. My mind is an aperture widening to take in the panorama of possibility. THIS was here all along. Women are sharing this with each other and I wasn't in a place to fathom it. Until her. There is an unfamiliar seesaw of capability within our dynamic. Equity. She sees me, I see her: an unflinching, all-encompassing knowing. Like coming home but to a feeling instead of a place.
'I see you' the delicate necklace she sent me displays as it constantly brushes against my collar bones. Unconditional validation. Recognition and safety mingled with desire, passion lust and want but never need. A woman, a mother specifically but not necessarily, understands the heavy burden of need. Need is not romantic, it is obligation. She instinctively understands this.
We are free falling but there is no ground. Riding the wave until it crests and returns to the ocean. It is the mutual acknowledgement of the possibly ephemeral nature of the thing, the lack of forever proclamations, that make it so desirable and liberating.
Go figure. It is from the softness of women that everything is born.
Sep 30, 2020 | Comments Off